Drones in North America

The world is a dangerous place.

Drones in North America

Postby Soulforger » 08/ 04/ 12 5:09 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/14/opinion/r ... index.html


Don't let drones invade our privacy


Editor's note: Rand Paul, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Kentucky.

(CNN) -- When assuming office, every government official must take an oath to abide by and uphold our Constitution. Since 2010, I have made that my mission in Congress. Unfortunately, the Obama administration is not upholding nor abiding by the Constitution -- in fact, this administration is going to great lengths to continually violate it.

Its most recent transgression involves the use of domestic drones.

These small drones are to be used as a crime fighting tool for law enforcement officials. But is unwarranted and constant surveillance by an aerial eye of Big Government the answer?


In a memorandum issued by President Barack Obama's secretary of the Air Force, the stated purpose of these drones is "balancing ... obtaining intelligence information ... and protecting individual rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution."

However, flying over our homes, farms, ranches and businesses and spying on us while we conduct our everyday lives is not an example of protecting our rights. It is an example of violating them.

The domestic use of drones to spy on Americans clearly violates the Fourth Amendment and limits our rights to personal privacy. I do not want a drone hovering over my house, taking photos of whether I separate my recyclables from my garbage.


More in link...
We need an elected Senate! :hurray:
User avatar
Soulforger
 
Posts: 3857
Joined: 11/ 24/ 03 3:26 pm
Location: West Coast 4Life

Re: Drones in North America

Postby Soulforger » 08/ 04/ 12 5:15 pm

http://rt.com/usa/news/domestic-drone-court-ruling-743/


Domestic drone justice: US court green-lights police UAV use


A North Dakota court has approved the use of drones to help arrest citizens on US soil. UAVs have primarily been used to conduct strikes against purported militants in countries like Pakistan, but their use at home has been on the rise as of late.
­District Judge Joel Medd denied a request to dismiss charges against Rodney Brossart, who was arrested after law enforcement resorted to using a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to inspect his property, according to court documents obtained by US News.

Judge Medd wrote that “there was no improper use of an unmanned aerial vehicle” and that the UAV “appears to have had no bearing on these charges being contested.”

Last June, Brossart was arrested after a long standoff with police, prompted by his refusal to return a herd of cows that had meandered onto his farm in the town of Lakota. During the standoff, Brossart was tased by police after allegedly threatening to kill an officer entering his property. At one point, the Department of Homeland Security offered the local SWAT team one of its Predator drones.

Court documents show that the drone was used “for surveillance” while local SWAT team chief Bill Macki said the UAV inspected Brossart’s property to make sure that neither he, nor his family members, were armed or left the farm during the arrest.

Brossart was eventually arrested and charged with terrorizing and stealing property, as well as criminal mischief. His family members were also charged.

Bruce Quick, Brossart’s lawyer, said “guerilla-like police tactics” were used against his client. He stressed that authorities had no legal right to use the drone to help capture Brossart, as the plane had been “dispatched without judicial approval or a warrant.” But he also noted that the entire case reeked of constitutional violations.

“The whole thing is full of constitutional violations,” Quick told US News. “ The drone use is a secondary concern.”

He also said the use of a taser against his client was “torturous” and likened it to “water-boarding.”

The prosecution, however, argued that the drone was used only after arrest warrants had been issued, and that they were not used to gather evidence, but only to ensure the safety of the SWAT team that was about to raid the farm.

“Unmanned surveillance aircraft were not in use prior to or at the time Rodney Brossart is alleged to have committed the crimes with which he is charged,” State prosecutor Douglas Manbeck wrote.
Congress mulls legislation for a droned-up 'brave new world'In the meantime, the domestic use of drones has been subject to discussion on Capitol Hill. On Wednesday, Representative Edward Markey (D-MA) introduced a draft bill seeking to tighten the regulations on drone use for both the government and private companies. The proposed Drone Aircraft Privacy and Transparency Act of 2012 requires that police obtain warrants to use drones for certain types of surveillance.

“When it comes to privacy protections for the American people, drones are flying blind,” Markey stated, as quoted by the Huffington Post. “Drones are already flying in US airspace – with thousands more to come – but with no privacy protections or transparency measures in place.”

The Congressman said America was entering a “brave new world” and stressed that a company should not be allowed to make a profit out of selling consumer information obtained through drone surveillance.

“Currently, there are no privacy protections or guidelines and no way for the public to know who is flying drones, where, and why,” Markey added. “The time to implement privacy protections is now.”

Other lawmakers have already voiced concerns on the domestic use of drones. In June, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) introduced the Preserving Freedom from Unwanted Surveillance Act, which also requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant prior to the deployment of drones for surveillance purposes.

Congress has asked the Federal Aviation Authority to draw up rules to integrate drone use into the domestic airspace by 2015. The agency is set to start issuing licenses for police and emergency services drones this month. It has already authorized the use of pilotless Predator drones in the airspace above nearly 10,000 acres in North Dakota.

The US Army is also hoping to station drones on military bases throughout the nation after obtaining certification from the FAA.

Police throughout the country have other potential applications for drones, in addition to surveillance. In Texas, the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office obtained a pilotless Shadowhawk helicopter in hopes of eventually equipping it with weapons such as flares, smoke grenades, tasers and rubber bullets that could be used to subdue a crowd. However, that UAV crashed into a SWAT van during a photo op, raising the important issue of safety in a crowded urban environment.


More in link...
We need an elected Senate! :hurray:
User avatar
Soulforger
 
Posts: 3857
Joined: 11/ 24/ 03 3:26 pm
Location: West Coast 4Life

Re: Drones in North America

Postby DA_Champion » 08/ 04/ 12 7:39 pm

This must be what our police officers need to serve and to protect the public.
User avatar
DA_Champion
 
Posts: 18131
Joined: 01/ 07/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: Drones in North America

Postby Charles J. White » 08/ 04/ 12 7:52 pm

When ones combines artificial intelligence + facial recognition + with remote control drones

One ends up with:


Image


We are doomed, government is generally evil...
Image

Red Ensign, The True Flag

I Support Canada
User avatar
Charles J. White
 
Posts: 6442
Joined: 10/ 15/ 07 8:46 pm
Location: Saint John New Brunswick

Re: Drones in North America

Postby LAR » 08/ 04/ 12 7:56 pm

They better not fly in here. This cat won't rest until she knocks it down and eats it.
“People can tell you to keep your mouth shut, but that doesn't stop you from having your own opinion.”
― Anne Frank, The Diary of a Young Girl
User avatar
LAR
 
Posts: 4375
Joined: 03/ 20/ 07 4:33 am
Location: Cascadia

Re: Drones in North America

Postby backhoe » 08/ 05/ 12 4:11 am

Image

Image
Just a Merry-Hearted Keyboard PirateBoy, Plunderin' his way across the Internet....
Image
User avatar
backhoe
 
Posts: 32456
Joined: 01/ 20/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Angel of the 7th Station

Re: Drones in North America

Postby RedDog » 08/ 05/ 12 5:55 am

I can see these things being shot out of the sky. They'll last as long as radar cameras did in Fort Worth.
MORE ALBERTA. Image Less Ottawa.
Opinions expressed by RedDog on Free Dominion are those of RedDog alone and are in no way intended to represent the views of Free Dominion, its principals or moderators.
User avatar
RedDog
 
Posts: 36520
Joined: 04/ 07/ 04 8:54 pm
Location: High Plains

Re: Drones in North America

Postby Charles J. White » 08/ 05/ 12 6:36 am

Charles J. White wrote:When ones combines artificial intelligence + facial recognition + with remote control drones

One ends up with:


Image


We are doomed, government is generally evil...


I forgot to add the unPatriot Act as well, the only thing a true patriot would do is work to weaken the power of government, not strengthen it…We are all doomed
Image

Red Ensign, The True Flag

I Support Canada
User avatar
Charles J. White
 
Posts: 6442
Joined: 10/ 15/ 07 8:46 pm
Location: Saint John New Brunswick

Re: Drones in North America

Postby Soulforger » 08/ 05/ 12 2:49 pm

RedDog wrote:I can see these things being shot out of the sky. They'll last as long as radar cameras did in Fort Worth.



I though the USA was the land of the free... :shock:
We need an elected Senate! :hurray:
User avatar
Soulforger
 
Posts: 3857
Joined: 11/ 24/ 03 3:26 pm
Location: West Coast 4Life


Return to Wars and Rumours of Wars

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests