Essays on "lieberalism"

[Edward Kennedy]

While I am waiting word from legal counsel whether I should or should not expose bcl or wait for a more opportune time to display his "indiscretions, I will put the expose of lieberal tactics next on the agenda, back a bit and look at the serious problem we have as a nation and that all Western nations infected by the lieberal parasite, face.

The war against our own destruction has been in vogue for decades. It has been taken by lieberals into the education system populated by vulnerable children, open to the lies of socialism and the filth of political correctness. The msm has participated in the promulgation of the moral bankruptcy of lieberalism, aided and abetted even by religion. In the workplaces of the nation, especially in those where unions hold sway over their serfs(members), tyrrannical leaders seek to impose settlements that are not in the best interests of the state of the economy, or the taxpayer. With lieberalism established in religion, msm, the workplaces of the nation, follywood, and academia, the stage is set for the overthrow of all that is good, true, and free. Multicultism, abortion, attacks on the family structure, rad femwhackoism, and many other items have been used to chip away at the strength that holds things together in society, the family unit.

When did this start? Try when L.B. Pearson was elected over five decades ago, followed by turdeau, and successive lieberal leaders, plus a few red tories like mulroney who participated in the plan. Many policies pushed by lieberals form then on to the present were designed to weaken the nation...abortion, radfeminism, multicultism, NAFTA, etc have all take their toll.

Where are we going? It may very well not be where the "enemy" thinks.

[Julian]

[Edward Kennedy]

The lieberal bent to attempting to neutralize and defeat the surge of support for Randy Hillier has resulted, in a huge win in the last provincial election. Going from his first win by a very small margin to the gigantic support that caused a landslide destruction of the lieberals, had a strong reason for same that most outside this riding are unaware of.


Noting with trepidation the rise of, and association of the grassroots landowners organization province wide, with freedom and justice, and the respective relationship of the OLA with the PCPO, many of us saw the liars and fools who appeared to conspire to cause defeat of Randy Hillier by what the riding population apparently interpreted as defamation, lies and smear tactics.

First, opinion pieces by one individual, whose apparent interest in my opinion was purely financial, appeared in community publications and then there was a defamatory piece attempting to link the local landowners association headed by me, with the PCPO candidate, Randy Hillier in this riding. There were false allegations I saw clearly as an attempt to discredit Randy through me, due to alleged financial wrong doing. Seems I am expected to abide fools and liars in my existence and I generally do, but this defamatory bent pushed me to seek legal action and move towards a lawsuit of the paper in question, and the individual who had wrote the words that I saw as lies, defamation and malciousness as can be expected of lieberals.

The lawyer I consulted with has been instrumental in giving me free counsel time after time after time and I did not know why, until that time, when he asked me if I ever wondered why he had given his help gratis. I was embarrassed when he told me that several years ago he had retained me to do tree removals on his property and seeing I was fair and not in the business of gouging people, he had filed my name in his mind, and had more than amply paid me back.

At any rate, at that time he told me that although there were grounds to launch a legal action, he advised me to take a look at the bigger picture that this was not about me, but about Randy, and to govern myself accordingly. I took his advice and the paper did print a retraction.

However, I think the lieberal element, headed by a malicious liar who I saw as protecting his wallet in the whole affair, and having serious conflict of interest situaitions, was pushing in their frantic attempts to discredit Randy and the PCPO.

Thus in their usual way, and focusing on anyone and anything associated with Randy and the PCPO, they placed everything under their microscope. I even now wonder if there was more to this than meets the eye. There is generally a bigger picture and considering that I was the one in both the federal and provincial to push for and get a resolution in htis riding passed to can the hrc's, bigger interests I feel were behind the attempted attacks on my character that led me to separate myself from both the OLA and PCPO, over comments i made that were passed on up the line. Too late though for the buly boys.

The resolution was accepted at the provincial level, but Hudak backed away in implementing it as a campaign promise. On the federal level, the resolution sure gave some publicity to the injustices imposed by this arm of what it appears many see as tyranny and bigotry.

So who won? It seems that the bigger fish are in imminent danger of losing their power to PERSECUTE in a kangaroo court of their own making where they have a conviction ratio of 100%, making them the losers. I now have, more time, and money to devote to new battles and causes, so the whole affair I account as a win for me, just by being my regular outspoken self. The perpetrators and liars wil at some point in time, get to meet me in person and stand toe to toe and listen to me, something I know they are not anxious to do. In the meantime, I am working behidn the scenes on an expose of the whole dirty mess.

However, the biggest win was the landslide victory for Randy, who appears to be settling into the same pattern of permanency that characterizes Scott Reid. Down the road, the liar and greedy clown who has defamed many, stands to pay and also have his wallet thinned substantially. It could well be but another provincial election away.

[Edward Kennedy]

Back to tactics that expose lieberals as childish, cowardly, whiny apron grippers.

When I was an OLA leader, I had complaints about a field enforcement officer in my area who was writing orders based on her 'opinion "I reasobably believe that". Looking at several of her orders, I found this to be a given, almost like a script. When a special meeting was held concerning this individual, all agreed that I would author a letter addressing the apparent injustices she was causing. It appeared to me that when she issued a report, it placed the landowner/farmer in a reverse onus situation, necessitating the hiring of consultants at considerable expense to look at things from their expertise to prove the landowner innocent, If that was the case, then like the hrc's, the process was the punishment.

Looking at the whole picture, I saw that an individual like this particular woman could in fact be incompetent and without any knowledge required in her position with the MOE, create problems where there were none in an attempt to justify her position. I contacted her manager and asked what her credentials were and he refused to which I then demanded his credentials to which he refused to which I contacted Gerretsen, the mcsquinty appointed minister of the environment. He downloaded me to an "eastern director" who upon reading my concerns, in my opinion, panicked and called the Kingston police and the OPP claiming she feared for her life, and that I was not to contact the manager and the field officer in question.

This whole story is told here under the OLA heading, and details the correspondence I had with her. Note that she, like the manager, refused to prove the credentials of her manager, field officer, and now at my demands, her own. Note that in my profession the first thing I front to a client is my ISA and MET certification to prove I am quailified to diagnose and deal with tree problems. All these MOE drones refused and it makes me think NONE of them were or are qualified to be in their positions.

To make a long story short, an individual I know with great abilities discovered that the field officer had checked in to the MOE from another agency and at last word, has checked out of the MOE and gone to another system bureaucracy. The manager, if it is the same person, appears to have graduated as a civil engineer and the manager, was a secrretary with the Ministry of Transportation in the nineties. It also appears her father was a high profile lieberal holding public office in his life.

This all adds up to my own opinion that all of them were and are incompetent and their incompetence caused hardship for area landowners. The information I uncovered left the aggrieved landowners substantial evidence to launch lawsuits against the MOE but I have not heard word if any have.

Note the first tactic was to attempt to intimidate me so I would run and hide. Well, that made things worse for them and in my research, I see that incompetence is a major problem in system provincial bureaucracies. The investigation I openly accepted with my hardcopy expository existence of all three discredited these bureaucrats and attempts by the police to arrrange a meeting with the director were all met with her expressed desire to not even talk to me. Well, that figures, I think we all know why she did not want to meet with me and it is not because I am allegedly violent, it is in my opinion her realization I am having none of her nonsense and in a battle of wits with me she would be totally unarmed. I feel she and her underlings had NO CREDENTIALS or qualifications and exposure would have created a scandal and big problems. She did not file a lawsuit when I wrote she was a liar and since truth is an absolute defence, I did not fear that she would.

The "cry wolf" tactic of claimed violence like in this case, is a favorite tactic these cowards use to deflect attention away from the real problem at hand. The hrc's tried it by having police come to visit me on three different occasions, and a liar...er lawyer I wrote a very blunt letter to reported me as violent to them as well but they were having none of it. I expect that whiner is a lieberal coward as well and at a later date I will post that letter here.

So we see the modus operandi of lieberals is to run crying to the nearest enforcement agencies and make false accusations and slander their adversaries. That appears to be their favorite tactic, no doubt because they are cowards and it is their first method they try to use to hide their dishonesty and corruption.

Do not be intimidated, in these cases it all resulted in people being exposed, and made fools of. The truth is the greatest weapon to use against lieberals as they are usually on the wrong side of it. iN the case of the hrc's, the police visits were opportunities to educate them as to the nature of the inquisitors and I quite enjoyed doing so.

Life is exciting, all one has to do is stand for freedom, truth and justice.

[Edward Kennedy]

It is a given that lieberalism is a morally bankrupt RELIGION adhered to by most in that camp. Their favorite tactic has been and is to lie and misrepresent, and depict their opponents as something evil, which is actually more descriptive of themselves. They take any issue, twist and doctor it, and when it is so battered by falsehoods, they present it as truth.

Take the abortion issue, their first tactic was to make it a womens' rights issue so as any who opposed what it really was, a basic right to life of innocent babies, these liars would brand anyone as misogynistic. Next came the semantical twist, using the word "foetus" or "piece of tissue" to dehumanize the child. This tactic was and is used by leftists such as the national socialists of Germany to depict particular groups as inhuman, and then target them for genocide. This tactic was and is adopted by that cancerous disease of lieberalism in free nations worldwide, and also in dictatorships.

The term pro life was changed by lieberals to anti choice, a term I approve of personally, because I oppose the choice of anyone to not only torture and murder babies, but also to rape, steal, mug, pimp and the many other criminal acts of people best executed as they not only have not any good use to society, but also waste resources. So you might say that it is a short step from there to justifying the death and destruction of leftism/lieberalism/socialism and that I speak of revolution. Has not the history of this planet been all about the continuing struggle for good vs evil, and cannot that be identified as right vs left? Of course it can.

Do I condone revolution? I have heard many people wiser than I say that this is what must happen to set things right again. You make your own judgement on me, on that issue.

As always happens, science and technology push truth to the surface and that is the greatest fear of lieberals, and so it has happened with the abortion issue. Thus the murders of millions are now plainly seen as worse than an innocent man being executed for a crime he did not commit and we all know the person responsible primarily was turdeau, and his minister of "injustice".

So this is how it always is, and the same scenario repeats itself. You can be sure that almost anything lieberals push is wrong and evil and what they oppose is right.

So to give more proof of the fact that lieberals are racists and haters, here is a stroll down memory lane that provides just one such proof. Turns out that those of that camp who shout, "Death to racists" should turn their guns on themselves.

viewtopic.php?f=22&t=138467

[Gerry T. Neal]

Classical Liberalism is the basis of Modern Conservatism, small governments, minimal intervention in the market, minimal regulation in most affairs. Keep government small, the markets will sort themselves out.

Classical Liberalism is not the basis of Modern Conservatism. A person can be in favour of small government, minimal or no governmental in the market, and minimal regulation, without being a conservative. Those beliefs merely make him a liberal - or, in contemporary terminology, a libertarian. For such a person to be a conservative he must also believe that the family not the individual is the basic unit of society, that the family is prior to and more important than the individual, that the accumulated wisdom and experience of mankind passed on from generation to generation in the vessel of tradition is a better guide than either reason or modern, progressive, science, that human nature, if it changes it all, changes very slowly, remaining basically the same over millenia, and that therefore customs and institutions of society which have evolved to accommodate that nature cannot be made obsolete by a century or two of rapid technological advancement, that social evil is primarily the result of a moral flaw which exists in the heart of every human individual and which cannot be fixed by human efforts, therefore all visions of progress and utopia are doomed to fail. It is that set of beliefs, not the prior set of beliefs, that is the sine qua non of conservatism. Edmund Burke, the father of Modern Conservatism, entered Parliament as a Whig, a classical liberal, it is true. He is known, however, as the father of Modern Conservatism, not because of his classical liberalism, but because of the sentiments expressed in his Reflections on the Revolution in France. In that book, he argued in defense of the things the Tory Party stood for - the ancient constitution of church and state in Great Britain, the monarchy and the established Church, and condemned the "armed doctrines" of Rousseau (the father of the modern revolutionary Left, whose ideas gave birth to the French Revolution) and Locke (the father of classical liberalism). He only became the father of Modern Conservatism, in other words, by turning from the liberalism of his own Whig party, and accepting the core beliefs of the Tory Party, of which his old friend Samuel Johnson had been the 18th Century's premier champion.

[Edward Kennedy]

Thank you Gerry, it is always a given that you approach any subject matter with logic, perception and intelligence...by that reality there cannot be any specs of lieberalism within you.

[Edward Kennedy]

INTIMIDATION TACTICS BY THE LEFT

Most are aware of the intended use of intimidation by the left, to strongarm their warped and morally bankrupt "no value" value system on others. This demonstrates ignorance and is bound to get them in serious trouble, as it has on one notable occasion when a large group of ara/arc bulllies armed with stell pipes, attacked three youths several years ago and were bested to the point that one of the bullies was seriously injured when the youths exercised their rights to self defence.

Whether it is some fool like jason devine stalking and harrassing an innocent woman, libelling her and then realizing his gaffe, slinking away like a rat to his hole,(while the calgary flatfeet look on and do nothing) or a group of idiots bravely spitting in the faces of innocent women and children at a pro life peaceful demonstration, the left refuses to operate without attempting to impose violence or the threat of same on their opponents.

Note the universty of zero demonstration that leftist trash imposed on their attack against freedom of expression and property rights, in denying Anne's right to speak. Again, the area flatfeet enabled the closing of the event, thus in the way of cowards, refusing to live up to their mandate to "serve and protect" and capitulating to injustice.

The only course of action that should have been entertained would have been to order the offenders out, and if they had refused, bring on the riot squad and disperse/arrest thoseprofligates. If the so called system will not uphold the rights of the citizenry against bullies and socialist scum, the only alternative is for the people themselves to enforce their own right to assemble and enjoy porperty they have rented. It seems enforcement agencies have become cowards and useful idiots in the hands of the leftists.

I would encourage leftist would be heroes and bullies in their attempted acts of violence, to read the dangers they expose themselves to. They are free to disregard what I say here, but they cannot discard the consequences of their foolhardiness.

Leftists hisotrically have used intimidation and fear to control people. It is a demonstrated given that they try to do the same here in canuckistan. So what is it about intimidation that they find so vital to their modus operandi?

I think it is the feeling of power that fear brings in the targets of intimidation as well as an attempt to escape the confrontation that good men would bring to bullies. IF they scare people enough, those targets will refuse to engage and confront the bullies, and that will spell victory. If the left projects the idea that they are scary and can and will impose violence on their opponents, they use that to their advantage in the goal of making their opponents too afraid to oppose them.

Sounds like a good plan, but that is not what reality demonstrates. Intimidation has a steep price to pay in any event, and the left seems to miss this by a country mile.

It goes without saying that would be leftist intimidators use the same tactics that they know would intimidate themselves, and that yeardstick of measurement is indeed seriously bent.

What these fools seem to miss is that success in scaring people can have serious consequences, even if it appears to succeed. The people who intimidation works on are those who back away, spurred by their fear of violence. Yet I would take a look at some of these people who are seen as cowards because they back away or try to avoid violence. Apparent success can get the bully a wooden box and a trip to the graveyard. Just suppose a leftist cowardly goon targets what looks to him like a geek, a 99 pound weakling so to speak, a stick man wearing glasses. The leftist goon approaches his target, insults and taunts him, humiliates him, laughs in his face, and then stands there staring him down. Great fun he thinks, especially when he gets to grandstand and show the girls in the crowd what a hero he is. In reality, he is a fool.

All is never as it meets the eye. So the leftist bully has won, facig down and humiliating his target. But what about that guy to the left of the target who has been silently watching the show, and when the bully turns towards him, confidently and arrogantly, sneering one moment before the lights go out and he wakes up in a hospital room with a fractured jaw, concussion, and blurred vision? He never saw it coming and to be sure, there are people who can visit such a thing on anyone they choose, even so called self defence experts.

You might say that is a worse case scenario for the bully but NO, it is not. What if the humiliated "geek" is one of the estimated 300, 000 psychopaths in Canada, according to Psychologist Robert Hare. What if this harmless "geek" in the days, weeks and months after the fact, stews and plots his revenge on the bully? All the while he was being humiliated, his gaze never left the face of his opponent, and branded in his mind now is every minute detail of his attacker. The geek had noted the banners of the group there, and after hours, online, that same night, he located the headquarters, the address, and eventually located his attacker by extensive investigation, his address, and every detail necessary to effect a strike. The geek did not go off when confronted, and humiliated, but that is not his modus operandi. The bully will never see it coming, he will only feel the cold steel as it enters between the ribs on his left upper side, and he will only have time to see the intense hate in the face of his attacker, as consciousness lleaves him for the last time this side of judgement.

Taking another scenario, the bully in the initial confrontations works his way down the line of the pro life demonstrators, watching in satisfaction as he and his comrades cow everyone they confront. Glances from the chosen targets are averted down, and some say they do not want trouble. Gee, this is fun, bullying the opposition, humiliating them and winning the day. At the end of the line the bully picks the wrong guy who does not flinch, and shows no signs of being afraid. Now the bully has a serious problem. He is too stupid to realize that the problem is now serious, that he has just met someone who is not afriad and refuses to back down. The bully starts to feel fear himself, the same fear he has imposed on others. He wonders why this `Christian`is not acting like ohters in the crowd, after all, the bully thought that he was safe in doing his thing as Christians are never violent, are they. Hmmmm..too late now. His solution is to escalate the situation as backing down himself is unacceptable, after all, he cannot be seen to be a coward in front of everyone. He steps forward, and pushes his opponent, who suddenly is not there, reappearing on the left, and unleashing two blows, one to the neck, rupturing the aesophagus, and the other to the temple, turning out the lights.

A few months later, after the funeral, the family of the bully stands as the judge enters the courtroom from his chamber and dismisses the lawsuit with the words, "self defence", unintended but justifiable homicide".

Okay bully, you may never get to choose, but these are but a few of the options you entertain whenever you step beyond the limit of your rights. You need to know that trying to intimidate people who are minding their own business and asserting their freedom of expression could get you killed.

Why are intimidators on the left so stupid and short-sighted?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The most dangerous man I ever met was a soft spoken, unassuming, and gentle man who women were naturally attracted to. In my travels, decades ago, I met this man on a worksite, and discovering I was living out of my car, he invited me to stay with him as he had recently divorced. I accepted, and my stay furthered my education in ways I will never forget.

Women gravitated to him like flies to honey, and i recall coming in late on various occasions and seeing diferent women sitting across from him at the table, intent on the topic at hand, generally and mostly the topic of relationship difficulties they were encountering. One time I came in, took my jacket off and headed to the basement recreation room only to find a woman wrapped in a fur coat, sitting on his lap with tear wet eyes.

The unique thing about him was that he was not in the business of taking advantge of the vlnerabilities of rejected women, but offered them a refuge, a solace, with no strings attached. This was and is rare in my gender, but the lesson i learned has reaped rewards of immense proportions, resulting in my own cultivation of very close relationships with members of the opposite gender. That is however, off topic...for now.

I came to learn all is not as it meets the eye, and especially with people. It came one day when I watched this quiet, unassuming, gentle man destroy an oppponent, one who had tried to bully him and threatened him. I was a witness, and he never mentioned it to me or anyone after the fact. In the months I stayed, I discovered his background had included working on offshore rigs in the North Sea, a stint as a male model, and a lengthy time in the Royal Marines in a special forces unit. He had in fact killed in regular duty, and in hand to hand combat. Shooting someone is hard enough, hand to hand is not at all easy.

Now the one and only bully I ever saw in my association with him, who crossed him, went down quickly, and I have never seen such a quick and tidy disposal of a bully in my entire life. I was privileged to witness yet another joyous site, a 24 year old martial arts expert who confronted a pipe fitter on the job who sported a pot belly, a serious but friendly demeanor, and a respectful attitude. The overage "punk" made one aggressive move before he ended up in la la land after taking two fast shots to the side of his head, the first wilting him and starting him down to kiss the ground, and the second thrown in for good measure on the way down. He was left a collapsed mess on the ground with his buddies frantically trying to slap him back into consciousness.

If any leftist bully ever runs into one of these character subtypes and spits at them, they will be humbled for sure, and will be fortunate to escape with only humiliation and no physical damage.

Note that I used the word, "subtypes". Yes, there are more than these two like that out there and I have met others fortunately on amicable terms.

As I have demonstrated in my first section, there are many options that the intimidator is not aware he may live, or die to enjoy. Thus when I see the banner of some leftist group intended to scare others, emblazoned with the image of a hooded slag and pronted nonsense about ruling the streets and others picking up the pieces, I am both amused and angry at the intended threats therein. I am also in awe at the stupidity of fools who would not only originate such a banner, but march under it`s colors.

The colors of such a banner should be black for evil, yellow for cowardly, green for ignorance, and finally red for the blood of those who march under and promote that violence...the final qualification is that blood could well be theirs.

Living by the sword will necessitate dying by that same sword.

The thoughts expressed here by me originate from an experential peersepctive, from bits and pieces of wisdom and knowledge I ahve picked up, and am still picking up in my life, and from my late and great Uncle Don, an OPP detachemnt commander in the Thunder Bay area, the man who among other things told me, Àn asshole is still an asshole, even in a uniform`. Damn, even after all these years I do so miss him.

A final word to the system and the liberals in it, from me to you. I have warned people about their insidious attacks on others, as in `maximum disruption`and anyone involved in bullying of any sort, had best be aware that it is not a threat, but an observation that they put themselves in immediate conflict with many types of people. While I note it is credible for me to think that the left are safer from violence instigated by Conservatives, than we are from violence instigated by fools with banners that threaten same, none of us are safe from it in our existences. It is only a matter of time, until it comes and as I always said, it is not a matter of ÌF`trouble comes, but `WHEN`. All should be aware of that, and more especially those who take a high profile position in the scheme of things.

I have not taken a really high profile postion in the battle for freedom and justice, as that taken by men and women, and especially women such as Conservative women we all know, admire, respect, chersish and love.

I am sure that the high profile people on both sides of the battle have received threats, some sufficient to be reported to enforcement agencies. My past experience with threats is that communicated threats can be arbitrarily dismissed as harmless, even though they may be upsetting. If anyone is serious in getting anyone they target, you are not going to see or hear it coming, and generaly it will be a quick death. The only question I would pose to those on the other side is do they think it is worth it. Do they figure it is good to die for their persecution, libelling and abuse of those they do not agree with. This is a question all those on the left should ask themselves. Dying for good is not a waste, dying for wrong is a fool`s game.

One day years ago I was warned by my Uncle Don, that there were a lot of nutcases and psychotics out there and that activism on a high level necessarily would expose one to danger. He intimated that one should ask oneself if it is worth it.

As a much lower profile acticvist than othes, I have chosen to represent myself as a regular grass roots citizen tired of the over regulation, immorality, corruption and other garbage liberalism and lieberals are responsible for. I am different in that I defy the bondages of political correctness that I refuse to apply to my conduct and words as I travel life`s journey. I am a free man, and no tyrannical hrc, gun banners, rad fems, or lieberal useful idiots of any stripe will be allowed to control me...once again, I AM A FREE MAN.

I decided long ago to live that, to breathe that, to proclaim that in every aspect of my existence. No bureaucracy, no agency, no leftist, no religion, NOBODY will be allowed to interfere with that RIGHT we all have but which few will defend if it costs them money, effort, security, or the false sense of happiness they may think they gain by being low key.

I have decided there are a lot of things worse than dying, and I confronted long ago the reality that life without freedom is not worth living. You all know what I am going to say next, and while dying is something which all want to avoid, it sooner or later comes to us all.

As time passes, I more and more see that to live passively, not rocking the boat, sticking one`s head in the sand, denying reality, and other actions enabling one to escape their responsibility to fight evil, is an act of abject defeat, and cowardice. I could not live with myself at even the thought, yet I am humbled by men and women in the thick of things.

There is a breed of dog called a Redbone hound. This dog is used in tracking bears and cougars, it is fearless and will fight to the death. Many Conservatives could take a lesson from such a noble animal which both humbles and puts to shame may people.

So if you think you know what I am going to say next, you are probably right. In the face of system attacks on freedom, I have and will oppose it. In the face of leftist attacks on all that is good, including justice and democracy, I will oppose them, whatever it takes, up to, and including my life.

I only hope that the cowardice and stupidity of the left has not disallowed the same reality to ooze into the dark recesses of their evil besotted minds, that they too, are susceptible to the same dangers as their opponents.

Nuff said!

[Edward Kennedy]

LIEBERALISM = FAILURE

I have dreaded this section I am about to write, it pains me at length to examine the proof that lieberalism is a morally bankrupt mindset, and that many if not all of their policies, predictions, and ruminations implemented in years past have been and are abject failures, wasting billions in money, and causing pain, suffering and death, all of which would be unecessary were we to ban these pitifully pathetic peons of pithy pedantry.

The worst thing about these lieberal lunatics is that they demand the rest of us, who are sane, embrace their idiotic ideas to our breasts much like one would do with an adder, the result of course being the same.

Aborticide was hailed as the savior of the oppressed woman, way back when turdeau and his minister of injustice, John Turner legalized abortion and homosexuality. The result of that destructive policy we are now seeing here and in other Western nations where the shortfall of people represented by the innocent victims of aborticide has resulted in a change in demographics, is well documented. Wanna argue bout that? Let us start with dishonor murders. Tell ya what fool, if you would argue against reality, you need to give your head a shake.

The legalization of homosexuality has not necessarily resulted in more homosexuals, but it has resulted in belligerent activists of that lifestyle being entrenched in and pushing for rights that nobody of any persuasion is entitled to. Can anyone tell me what right any philosophy has to brainwash vulnerable children into any particular mindset, under the auspices of education paid for by our tax dollars? Huh?

Like all lieberal policies, this gaffe perpetrated by yet another fool leader of the lieberal body politic has resulted in the murders of milions of innocent babies, denied their basic right to life, desecrated women emotionally, mentally, spiritually and physically. In fact, the radfem "screed" by it's hypocritical support of aborticide makes them complicit and labels them as misogynistic, items they quietly ignore but which proves that yet another lieberal policy has wreaked havoc, and caused pain, suffering, destruction and death from it's imposition.

Speaking of which, I have oft pointed out the sweetness, and attractivety of Conservative women, many of who are so sublime, they merit being placed on a pedestal and/or inside picture frames as works of art to be admired and cherished. Why do I harp on this so much, am I oversexed and underworked, or am I oversexed and overworked? None of the above apply. I among others, have noticed how twisted many lieberal women are, who have drunk the kool aid. They have lost their natural affection and are ugly as sin on the inside, and any male with an ounce of perception, realizes that a woman ugly on the inside is also ugly on the outside. Ever noted the rise in the divorce rate as time passed from the moment radfeminism became fashionable? Yet proof of another failed lieberal policy/mindset.

Now what of multicultism, a policy formulated by Lester the "red" Pearson and pushed by turdeau. Has it enriched our nation? We see now the professions of the failure of this pathetic policy by European leaders, and the violence it has and is causing, the insurrections, and the astronomical costs this lieberal policy, as they all do, has imposed on us.

One would even venture to wonder if the synergistic impact of multicultism, abortion, radfeminism, and homosexcuality was planned as they all target for damage and destruction, the nuclear family,

I doubt that there is enough bandwidth for me to expose other lieberal policies that have failed but I cannot let the foolishness of c-68 pass without commenting on it. Originally reported by Allan Rock,( that lieberal gun banner who is now esconced as head of the U of Zero, that bastion of tyranny, and enemy of free speech) as costing about two million to implement, has actually cost well over a thousand times that. and resulted in the alienation and distrust of enforcement agencies who made criminals of honest gun owners who did not cross the "T''s" of that insiduous piece of garbage. It focused on people who were not the problem and ignored the real criminals. Yet another example of a lunatic lieberal policy that not only was inefectual but actually, like all of them, caused damage, and funded by our tax dollars. The only good thing about it was that hunters in droves wrote for and received copies of that bill, which they put to good use in the hunting camp outhouses of the nation.

Perhaps people are waking up nationally and the recent CPC majority is an indication that the truths I have written herein are becoming well known. Too bad that the people of"untario" are not as sharp, proof of which is seen in the third term election of mcsquinty, one whose actions I see effectively brand him as a corrupt liar.

[Edward Kennedy]

LIEBERALS ARE VIOLENT

Ever noticed that lieberals have one big card they play when backed into a corner or are exposed in their CRIMINALITY?
It is the VIOLENCE card.

Every occasion where I really hsone the light of truth on lieberals, be it bureaucratic corruption, hrc hypocrisy, or system intimidation, the lieberals crushed under the weight of exposure first thing decried I was violent and ran to the system enforcers who to date, have found me innocent of that label(libel) as used by LLL. (LOONIE LEFTIST LIEBERALS)

There is a payback here though, because in making their tired allegations, in every case they have been discredited and thus exposed as LIARS, DEFAMERS, and COWARDS. So now they are much like the boy who cried wolf, and if I really becaue violent, nobody would listen.

The truth is that LLL are the most violent denizens of la la land. How so? Does anyone deny that violence entails the wlolesale atack and destruction of the targets of the LLL of the hrc's, all because these targets chose to exercise their freedom of expression? Does anyone think that it is not violent for LLL like bcl(bigotted cowardly lieberal) to practice what I see as defamation of innocent people? Does anyone not think it violent of LLL of bureaucratic organizations to impose bullying tactics on landowners, and forcing them to spend tens of thousands to defend themselves from LLL pronouncements of guilt from incompetent and unqualified enforcement officers?

Yes indeed, violence is the way of the LLL and in that label use , it goes without saying that LLL also stands for LYING LEFTIST LOONIES. These criminals have infiltrated academia, religion, politics, justice system, the workplace in many system bureaucracies, msm, follywood, as well as in their usual homes such as cracks in sewer pipes and the dark recesses of manure storage pits.

Just to clarify, I will not deny that I do not have the ability to be violent. Violence, like a gun, is a tool, to be used when and where nothing else will suffice. Examples are many, but if it legitimate for enforcement agents ot carry guns, then thta is all the proof I need, although it does raise an interesting question. If the system recognizes the right and necessity of police to carry firearms to deal with psychotics, most of them LLL, and off duty to carry a concealed handgun, to not only enforce the law but mainly to be able to defend themselves and have the ability to meet force with force on an equal footing with armed criminals, msot of them LLL, then why does the sytem not grant that same ability to others? Huh?

The answer is that the system does NOT have the right to deny not only the Charter right of FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THOUGHT that it has been through the LLL tyrannts and criminal inquisitors of the hrcs, but also DOES NOT have the right to deny security of the person to honest citizens everywhere. Concealed carry is a right that people have, and especially women.

If LLL do not like that, their women do not have to have weapons, they are free to get beaten, raped, and murdered of course as do their effeminate counterparts.

I am all for them in exercising their freedom of choice to be vulnerable to criminals, but they have no right to impose their mental illnesses on the rest of us.

[Edward Kennedy]

I will be posting this link to my Justice For All site where I will be addressing sticky subjects that may have legal ramifications for the owners if I publish them here, that way it will be my fight, not theirs. This article is on there at this time.

www.ruralrights.ca

[Edward Kennedy]

THE PERVERTED NATURE OF LIEBERALISM

Back again, and spurred on by a topic concerning Chaz Bono, I just posted on, all of the hatred I have has been drained from my very being and replaced by a deep sorrow for what has happened to this person. You can read my post here below.

--------------------------------------------------------------
"Re: Chaz Bono Saving Up to Buy a Penis
by Edward Kennedy » 01/ 10/ 12 5:33 am

"This is the saddest thing of late I have ever seen. I recall watching the Sonny and Cher show eons ago and when Chastity was born, they brought her on at the end of the show. She was the cutest sweetest little girl and so adorable, and my mother would always take time to catch the end just to watch this darling child.

Lieberalism has taklen and destroyed what God has created, and made a desecration of all that was beautiful. The whole event was nauseating and to see what has happened to her while the stupid lieberal herd applauds and encourages this travesty."
------------------------------------------------------------------

If you look at the perverted nature of the mental disease called lieberalism, you will have to agree that in aevery application, it's one effect is to take what is pure, good and true, and pervert/change that into the opposite of what God created/intrended. Do not be fooled, God is NOT mocked, and He is going to do big business with these literal "tools of hell" down the road. Laugh if you will, ridicule all you want, but that will not in the least ever change your destiny with Death, and you will know the Truth at the moment God draws back his hand of protection and lets Death possess you but for a moment before you stand before Him. If you care/dare to challenge me, then first have the courage and open mind it takes to go to Dr. Rawlings site, the author of "to Hell and Back" and see the evidence for yourself in living color and true testimony from bad people who faced Death and came back to accept that their perspectives of atheism, skepticism and life after Death were wrong.

So back to the central point of this treatise, it is proven that LIEBERALISM/HUMANISM/LEFTISM perverts all that is good and destroys people in process. How so?

It has taken the gift of life God has given and the sanctity and well being of God/s highest creation in the process of aborticide. It sacrifices innocent babies on the alter of materialism and desecrates the mind, soul, spirit and body of women who opt for this abominable process. Ever heard of WEBA, ever read of the compiications of abortion?

What of homosexuality? Are there not many young males who are destroyed by one of the serious consequences of that lifestyle, we know as AIDS, which has taken from the gene pool many whose contributions to society would have been substantial. No, I do not hate them, but I do HATE the activistic workers of iniquity that seek to impose their lifestyle on innocent public school children and pollute the blood supply by insisting on their right to give blood, knowing full well that they are high risk for Aids and that their act of blood donation will murder innocent men, women and children

What of lieberal policies like multicultism whereby rights are granted to dishonest refugee claimants to come here in supercession of the safety of the rest of us? More than a few of these people are criminals of the worst sort. How many women dying from AIDS by rapist refugees, or dishonot murderers will it take to have this destructive policy reversed?

How about the lies and heresies of the lieberals in the system who dishonestly cry that there has to be separatiuon of church and state, yet for decades have been teaching by rote and example the filthy, destructive religion they all themselves ascribe to, DIALETIC SECULAR HUMANISM? Huh?

How about the push for the right of rapists to not have their privacy invaded by not having to be subject to a test for STD's that would be and is a policy that would help their victims?

What about the defence of rank filthy pornography that dehumanizes women and children, on what defence do these liars and filthy pigs defend their dirty habits in using this garbage? I have been on "Women and Abuse" sites, and pornography has been a central contributor to their hurt. I was on a site for males enslaved by pornography and as hard as I am could not stand it. It was staffed by men who had escaped the tenticles of that monster...the last straw was reading the post of a male crying for help who said that all he did was visit pornographic sites and masturbate. He was an emotional and physical wreck.

Look at the attacks on freedom that every person born is initially entitled to, freedom of expression, thought, etc. Who opposes these God given freedoms? Ther hrc bigots and haters! Do you see why I hates these promoters of tyranny and racism?

I have mentioned the lieberal defence of pedophilia and need not comment on the damage and destruction that causes,,,take a research trip and see the political parties and scum who opposed the raising of the age of sexual consent pushed the the CPC for decades. THEY ARE ALL LIEBERAL NDP!!!

Look around you people, when you vote LIEBERAL oyu are voting for all these evils and more, enabling the hurt, pain, misery, destruction and death of the most vulnerable members of society. I could go on and on, but my hurt, pain, and emotional softness now is changing back as I consider the ones who are responsible for this attack on all that is good and the name of the villain is LIEBERALISM. God help you if you are one of the enablers of the evil of LIEBERALISM.

How can these scum stand to look at themselves in the mirror every day?

Your destiny is sealed, and in the end, He will be and is the only One who can.

Edward

[Edward Kennedy]

Jim Hnatiuk - Leader of the Christian Heritage Party
CHP Communiqué Vol 19, Jan 10, 2012

A Quiet Revolution

As a youngster I loved the game of Monopoly, and over the years that I played it I increasingly became very good at it. In fact, in the last few years that I played I very seldom lost, which unfortunately also led to very few wishing to play the game with me. Today, reminiscing some forty-five years later and analysing the secret of my success, one ploy or tactic that I used stands out among all the rest. And that was my ability to make side deals and ask for small rule changes to make the game more fun for the benefit of everyone, while unbeknownst to most of the players, I was setting the stage only to strengthen my position.

This was all accepted as part of the wheeling and dealing in the much loved family game of Monopoly. It is certainly understood that, neither I nor anyone should ever use such a self serving strategy in real life situations. Especially so in politics; the seriousness of the life changing impacts of government decisions shouldn’t ever be treated as some kind of game. But interestingly enough, I see my same childhood tactics successfully being played out in big politics today. Those in government who hold the dice get to change the laws and far too often we are finding they are simply changing the laws to benefit themselves, while convincing Canadians that the changes are really for the benefit of the country. So, do you see the similarity?

Let me give you a few examples:

Successive governments have told Canadians that mass immigration (250,000 plus every year) is a benefit to our economy, but that is a political lie for their political gain. In effect, the governing party has recruited 250,000 more bloc voters each year and our country in return has gotten higher unemployment levels and more dangerous streets. Watch the eight minute video, Mass Immigration or Domestic Growth for more information.

Here is another: Our current government has told Canadians that deficit spending is the best way out of this global economic crisis, but funding entitlements and wasteful spending with borrowed dollars is nothing less than theft. In effect, they are buying votes today with all this borrowed money that our grandchildren have to pay back. Our country is now near $600 billion in debt! For honest economic recovery solutions see here.

Here is one more: Our government has told Canadians that they support a woman’s “right to choose,” a policy that has resulted in the yearly slaughter of over 100,000 Canadian babies in their mother’s wombs. In effect, our so called “Conservative” government, rather than leading on this serious moral issue, has traded its responsibility for votes, seeking to earn support from Canada’s increasingly secular population by keeping the debate out of parliament. You can help end this holocaust! See here.

I could go on, but I trust you are starting to see my point. Our government’s disingenuous motives stand out to me like a sore thumb. They are effectively using my old game playing Monopoly tactics, but incredibly they are doing it with people’s lives and your finances, and putting at risk the safety of all Canadians.


When someone continually manipulates the rules it makes it disheartening for anyone else wanting to get involved. Now when the government manipulates the rules and deceives Canadians, that government’s focus has turned away from the betterment of Canada to one of self-preservation for political power. That, ladies and gentlemen, leaves only one option remaining for honest law-abiding citizens who wish to fight for and protect our Canadian freedoms as we’ve always known them. We as a people also have to shift our focus to that of a “Quiet Revolution”—a revolution in thinking, speaking, acting, and voting. This is not a revolution involving guns, bombs, and tanks. But the strength of this revolution will eventually hold our government and all political parties accountable. This revolution will bring back good legislation that will protect life, your family, your freedoms, your finances, and your job.

Join today and support the political organization and the Quiet Revolution that we are building in order to take back Canada. I encourage you to go to our website and join us today.

[Edward Kennedy]

LIEBERALISM: ETERNAL BASTION OF NANNY STATE CONTROL

For the purposes of this essay, i would qualify the reality that lieberalism can and does, have and always will, exist to some extent or other in every political party, and in any/all other entities because it is, as it always has been, by one name or other, in reality, that RELIGION with it's "no value", value system, known as dialetic secular humanism.

It's bent is to subjugate every person on the face of this planet, and in essence, is no better than any other religion or entity that has tried to do so, but failed. UNTIL NOW.

These forces of evil finally got it right when they targetted all societal edifices, and especially the education system and the printed press. One would think that in spite of the historical witness to leftist/humanist imposition of pain, sorrow, suffering and death on humanity, people would refuse to embrace this poison serpent to their breasts. Alas no, it seems the preponderance of the mindless grazing herd to self destruction is inbred, with substantial help through the brainnwashing by education, religion, "follywood", and any other acceptable container that holds the kool aid.

There is a direct connection on the use of attacks on moral absolutes of the Holy Bible, and true Christianity. I say that because the reality is that there are few "CHRISTIAN" religions today as most have been infected and polluted with the evils of lieberalism, rendering them not only useless, but another dispenser of the kool aid of humanism.

Immorality always produces chaos and this is followed by certain repression. That is the connection and use of attacks on all that is good, for while good exists evil will never win and humanism/lieberalism is as evil as it gets.

At this point I will focus on the biggest barrier to the total takeover of a nation, as the existence of true Christianity and the Word of God. This has and will always be the bane of the humanist, and thus is it any wonder today of the attacks on God, true Christianity, and the Holy Bible?

I pause to spit in the face of humanism/lieberalism/socialism and to defy their centuries old attacks on and attempted elimination of the Word of God and Christianity. All the forces of evil from creation and unto the end will never be able to accomplish this. Why? They face the Truth, Freedom, and Justice, all epitomes of Almighty God. For centuries the humanists have shaken their puny fists in the face of God, and have been unsuccessful, but still they try. All I can say is that when they reach the point where they think they have won, and that will come, they will face the omnipotent Lord of all and feel the wrath of judgment as depicted in Revelation. You can say that is a fairy tale and that you choose to live and get yours here. Well you will get your wish because following the dictates of humanism is a lesson in misery, and you will personally get yours at the moment of death, that we all will face.

Fools of the left do not realize the battle is a spiritual battle, and has been throughout the ages. I also pose one question, why is it that the Holy BIble that is anathema to the left has never been eradicated, while the reigns of tyrrants and dictators have all ended in defeat?

The two prong attack then we are seeing is an attack on morals, targetting vulnerable children sitting under largely immoral humanists in the education system, and a simultaneous attack on freedom by way of the nanny state which imposes laws, some good but many bad.

That is where we are today in the state of things current. Just look around, attacks by the system, used by humanists within, to ban guns, legalize prostitution, pedophilia, as they have perversion,abortion, swingers' clubs, with more to come. These laws are used to attack morality and expose people to the consequences of their immoral actions aided and abetted by a corrupt system.

Consider this an introduction to a more detailed analysis and documented exposure to the Truth,

It is symbolic I should conclude with the Truth that we all should love, cherish and defend.

"Cursed is the one who trusts in man, who depends on flesh for his strength, and whose heart turms away from the Lord."

Humanism, does just that, it erects a god to itself, identified as man being the solution to all his problems. Funny though, all down through the ages man under humanism has only created more and more problems.

[Edward Kennedy]

Multicultism's VIctims

Several European nations have declared multicultism a failure, here are several reasons why .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYZFdctB ... re=related