Judge Erupts in Angry Tirade Against Pro-Life Activist

[virgey]

You don't get it, do you? We don't have the rule of law. Our Constitution guarantees the right to life as well as noting the supremacy of God, both of which are flouted by our courts. For this judge to trumpet the rule of law, while actually flouting it from the other side of his mouth, is disingenuous in the extreme. Get off the bench!

It doesn't say who's god .. does it.

You want Allah to be making your laws TG?

There is not right for a fetus to be brought to full term .. you know that to be true.

That person has the right to appeal the decision, and the right to vote. They do not have the right to diSregard a Judges direct order.

= rule of law

Given the fact that this country is Christian, guarantees that the God referred to, IS the Christian God, and not Allah.
On a side note why do you not capitalize the word "God", but DO capitalize the word "Allah"? This I believe is very telling of your true intentions.

[smallLliberal]

Where did any judge come off banning anyone from going to a public place and speaking with members of the public?

There is a law that says you cant do that.

The Judge is upholding that law.

-------------------------------

CC, you should delete that post. I would hate to see you get in trouble because you got a little angry for a moment.

Seriously.

I would never do anything but this is a public forum and some people have an axe to grind.

Just as you are advocating to legalize weed and prostitution, so to is this woman advocating to save the lives of unborn babies.

The issue is ... where they are doing it.

Here is just fine. At the ballot box works. In your home is cool. A mile away you can buy a billboard. Put up a website if you want.

You just cant interfere with access to the clinic or hospital.

[free_life2]

Illegal Everything

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=153218

This is what progressives like smallliberal give us and of course dead babies and women on their knees servicing perverted men, that is freedom in the land of absurd liberalism that grows daily. Death and slavery and they call it freedom.

[smallLliberal]

On a side note why do you not capitalize the word "God",

my mistake, I normally do

I am not the greatest at spelling and punctuation ... and I am posting while on hold or waiting for something .. my posts are often rushed during the daytime ... at night I struggle with an iPad

please excuse my error ... God it is!

[virgey]

Are you aware of what would happen in this country to any judge who dared to tell a Muslim that his god was wrong?

Not true. If it was a terrorism trial and the defendant said his god told him to blow up a plane .. I would think the Judge would say the exact same thing.

You are missing the point. The Muslim most likely would be treated as a simple murderer, and not a religious fanatic for fear of reprisals from other Muslims.

[Connie Fournier]

Sure. Until someone decides that billboards should not be allowed, or that your home is NOT "cool". Then, you would support throwing people in prison for violating those arbitrary laws against speech, too. We get it. You are a hypocrite.

[free_life2]

Where did any judge come off banning anyone from going to a public place and speaking with members of the public?

There is a law that says you cant do that.

The Judge is upholding that law.

-------------------------------

CC, you should delete that post. I would hate to see you get in trouble because you got a little angry for a moment.

Seriously.

I would never do anything but this is a public forum and some people have an axe to grind.

Just as you are advocating to legalize weed and prostitution, so to is this woman advocating to save the lives of unborn babies.

Oh that is different ...imagine the horror of these babies living and or these women not being able to service doped out perverts!

[virgey]

Not a surprising reaction by the judge. An evil man to be sure.

If the law is morally wrong, there is no obligation to follow to it. This presupposes of course one has the correct moral bearing. Otherwise Hitler and Stalin and Mao were quite within their rights to do what they did. And everyone who followed their orders.

Of course there are individuals like smallliberal who have lost the capacity to think clearly and do not know right from wrong.

What really surprises and disappoints me, is that smallliberal has not been given a swift kick in the rear off of Freedominion.
That his kind of evil, for he is indeed evil, should not be tolerated on a forum dedicated to principled Conservatism boggles me, for he is neither principled nor conservative.

But maybe like Gollum, he has a part to play here. Thankfully in the end, he will get his just desserts.

I agree that he can be very evil, but to ban him would be to react the same way that his friends on the left typically do, such as Babble, which I believe is his home base.

[virgey]

What really surprises and disappoints me, is that smallliberal has not been given a swift kick in the rear off of Freedominion.

So your solution is to prevent free speech.

Awesome!

Thankfully the website owners truly believe in a Free Dominion. You want a dictorship and the stifling of free speech and ideals.

I have many conservative opinions. You might be too blinded to even spot them.

Exactly. Free Dominion is very fair, and tolerant of all views, which is the polar opposite of forums such as Babble, of which I believe you are a member.

[free_life2]

Things precious to Gullom .... woman as sex slaves, dead babies, Christians behind bars, conservative principles outlawed and mind altering drugs for everyone, "My precious!"

Have I missed anything smallgullom?

[Darren]

I should add.

There are many other pro-choice people here (some have pm'd me) and they are afraid to speak up.

So good work on stifling free speech.

I call BS. No one on this board is afraid of debate. If that was the case, we wouldn't be here. There isn't a single web site on the planet where individual rights (real ones, not the made-up lefty ones) are given greater reign or respected more. Stifling debate is what they do at Babble. Not here.

And you're a fine one to be talking about free speech. You applaud a judge who throws a woman into prison for exercising her constitutionally-guaranteed, inalienable right to freedom of expression. Good on ya, Brownshirt. The judge erred in law by denying this woman her constitutional rights. His ruling should be thrown out.

And you know what? I'm no longer going to refer to you as smallLliberal. From now on, you're bigFfascist.

[virgey]

I should add.

There are many other pro-choice people here (some have pm'd me) and they are afraid to speak up.

So good work on stifling free speech.

If they feel intimidated, then that is their problem. I believe this forum is for open discussion. Disagreement is part of any discussion. Some here believe in the death penalty, and some are against it. some here are atheists, and some are Christian.

[Gerry T. Neal]

The issue is ... where they are doing it.

Here is just fine. At the ballot box works. In your home is cool. A mile away you can buy a billboard. Put up a website if you want.

You just cant interfere with access to the clinic or hospital.

Alright, lets think that through shall we?

There is a law prohibiting people from interfering with access to a clinic or hospital.

What would be the reason for such a law?

There are two possible reasons:

1) It was put in place by leftists for purpose of protecting access to abortion.

2) It was put in place to ensure that people do not die because their access to medical treatment which might have saved their lives was blocked.

If the reason is the first, the law itself is unjust.

If the reason is the second, which I am assuming that it is, then we are dealing here with a situation which is the opposite of that for which the law was written. An abortion clinic exists to take lives, not to save lives. To use a law which exists to prevent people from blocking other people's access to life-saving medicine to punish someone for trying to stop the deliberate taking of human life is to enforce the letter of the law while completely violating its spirit.

[free_life2]

I should add.

There are many other pro-choice people here (some have pm'd me) and they are afraid to speak up.

So good work on stifling free speech.

I call BS. No one on this board is afraid of debate. If that was the case, we wouldn't be here. There isn't a single web site on the planet where individual rights (real ones, not the made-up lefty ones) are given greater reign or respected more. Stifling debate is what they do at Babble. Not here.

And you're a fine one to be talking about free speech. You applaud a judge who throws a woman into prison for exercising her constitutionally-guaranteed, inalienable right to freedom of expression. Good on ya, Brownshirt. The judge erred in law by denying this woman her constitutional rights. His ruling should be thrown out.

And you know what? I'm no longer going to refer to you as smallLliberal. From now on, you're bigFfascist.

I am going with GullomTroll

[smallLliberal]

Sure. Until someone decides that billboards should not be allowed, or that your home is NOT "cool".

I would be against that Connie.

Anti-abortion is a perfectly legit political and personal position. I would vigoriously defend your right to express that opinion in the proper settings.

Just leave the distressed women, Doctors and Nurses alone, please.