BREAKING! Fourniers WIN John Doe Appeal!

by **Conservative_Toronto** » 05/ 04/ 10 9:17 pm

Is this the first time RW has had to cut a cheque for one of his opponents? I just have this mental image of him curled up on the carpet weeping. Any chance of seeing a scan of the cheque posted here?
And not to change the subject, but any chance sometime soon of seeing RW on the stand, under oath, being cross examined?

by **Mark Fournier** » 05/ 04/ 10 9:28 pm

Conservative_Toronto wrote: ...any chance sometime soon of seeing RW on the stand, under oath, being cross examined?

Not soon, but it's coming in a number of cases and courtrooms.

by **J.B. Stone** » 05/ 04/ 10 10:34 pm

Mark Fournier wrote:
Conservative_Toronto wrote: ...any chance sometime soon of seeing RW on the stand, under oath, being cross examined?

Not soon, but it's coming in a number of cases and courtrooms.

....Ooooooops...... :oops:

by **LAR** » 05/ 04/ 10 10:42 pm

I'm so pleased I've been running amok all over the internet. :axe:

by **The Islander** » 05/ 04/ 10 10:57 pm

Is there a deadline as to when Wormy has to empty his piggy bank? Do the courts give him 90 days to pay up or how does that work? If he a little short of cash we might see a little flurry of complaints to the HRCs from him as he works to pay off not only the $10,000 but also his lawyers fees.

by **Ogopogo** » 05/ 04/ 10 11:28 pm

BCL has a new posting (nothing yet from ARC or Dawg):

Warmen Vs. FreeD: What Happens Next?
This was asked in the comments to my earlier post. From the decision:

[46] Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted to a different motions judge for re-consideration based on the principles set out above.

That is to say, the motion to have FreeD turn over the IPS and email addresses of its anonymous commenters will be reheard by another judge, and Warman asked to, 1) make a prima facie case that the comments directed at him were in fact defamatory, and 2) address the freedom of expression issues raised by the motion to the satisfaction of the this new judge.

So even this part of the case does not appear to have been concluded.

Labels: Richard Warman Vs. Free Dominion

posted by bigcitylib at 6:34 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

by **Connie Fournier** » 05/ 05/ 10 5:36 am

"0 Comments" :lol:

by **Edward Kennedy** » 05/ 05/ 10 5:55 am

Connie Fournier wrote:"0 Comments"

Strange, I have never known liberal fascists with the ability to stop verbal diahrhea from re routing from their asses through their mouths.

This is a first. :lol:

by **Edward Kennedy** » 05/ 05/ 10 5:57 am

The key to victory is to keep on throwing $$$ at this until the liars and fascists on the other side have been knocked to the ground, kicked in the teeth, and pounded into unconsiousness.

by **BlawBlaw** » 05/ 05/ 10 10:42 am

The Islander wrote:Is there a deadline as to when Wormy has to empty his piggy bank? Do the courts give him 90 days to pay up or how does that work? If he a little short of cash we might see a little flurry of complaints to the HRCs from him as he works to pay off not only the $10,000 but also his lawyers fees.

The general rule is that if a judge doesn't specifically say, then you settle up when the law suit finishes.

by **Mark Fournier** » 05/ 05/ 10 10:47 am

BlawBlaw wrote:
The Islander wrote:Is there a deadline as to when Wormy has to empty his piggy bank? Do the courts give him 90 days to pay up or how does that work? If he a little short of cash we might see a little flurry of complaints to the HRCs from him as he works to pay off not only the $10,000 but also his lawyers fees.

The general rule is that if a judge doesn't specifically say, then you settle up when the law suit finishes.

We're looking into this now but it appears that this will have to be paid before the case continues.

by **Faramir** » 05/ 05/ 10 9:09 pm

Mark Fournier wrote:Kudos also need to go to the Free Dominion John Does 1-8 who were also named in this particular SLAPP suit. Every one of them stood firm at great personal risk. It took guts and commitment to what is right to stand up to a professional plaintff.

And kudos to the intervenors - that seemed to make a difference here.

by **Connie Fournier** » 05/ 06/ 10 10:59 pm

Faramir wrote:
Mark Fournier wrote:Kudos also need to go to the Free Dominion John Does 1-8 who were also named in this particular SLAPP suit. Every one of them stood firm at great personal risk. It took guts and commitment to what is right to stand up to a professional plaintff.

And kudos to the intervenors - that seemed to make a difference here.

Yes, they did.

by **Ogopogo** » 05/ 07/ 10 8:37 pm

ARC has finally acknowledged the FD decision but it's buried in a post about the literary style of Mein Kampf!

by **Mark Fournier** » 05/ 07/ 10 8:54 pm

The future is not looking good for the people behind the ARC.

BREAKING! Fourniers WIN John Doe Appeal!

Who is online