Should Canada Pension Plan Participation Be Voluntary?

A forum for the discussion of Freedom Party issues.

Should Canada Pension Plan Participation Be Voluntary?

Yes, Canada Pension Plan Participation Should Be Voluntary
38
75%
No, Canada Pension Plan Participation Should Not Be Voluntary?
12
24%
Not Sure
1
2%
 
Total votes : 51

Postby dwday » 03/ 08/ 07 8:55 am

HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
Stange, I have children, own a home, and work, and oddly enough if I could keep my CPP contributions I would have more money for savings with better returns.


The most you could have paid into the CPP in 2006 was about $1910. Thats because there is a contribution ceiling.

I spend more than that on beer.


Double that if you're self-employed.
User avatar
dwday
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: 01/ 25/ 06 7:01 pm
Location: Saint John, NB

Postby Kate Shaw » 03/ 08/ 07 9:29 am

Yes. For those of us from other countries who have both vested pension plans and Social Security coming to us, it would be nice to have that CPP money to spend while we are in Canada, before Mandatory Retirement forces us back to our own cozy country.

But I'm not holding my breath.
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, not between classes, nor between political parties, either but right through every human heart." Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Image Support Israel!
User avatar
Kate Shaw
 
Posts: 24774
Joined: 12/ 07/ 04 2:21 pm
Location: Toronto

Postby Clinton P. Desveaux » 03/ 08/ 07 10:14 am

HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
Stange, I have children, own a home, and work, and oddly enough if I could keep my CPP contributions I would have more money for savings with better returns.


The most you could have paid into the CPP in 2006 was about $1910. Thats because there is a contribution ceiling.

I spend more than that on beer.


I don't undestand your point. That $1910 is my money which I earned, why should I be prevented from investing it?
Before you comment on economics buy a new or used a copy of "Theory of Money and Credit" (1912) by Ludwig von Mises
User avatar
Clinton P. Desveaux
 
Posts: 3876
Joined: 02/ 10/ 04 9:56 pm

Postby Clinton P. Desveaux » 03/ 08/ 07 10:15 am

RedDog wrote:Why is there a "contribution ceiling" under this lowest common denominator nanny structure? What business of government is it how much I choose to put away for the future?


These people don't trust you with your own money.
Before you comment on economics buy a new or used a copy of "Theory of Money and Credit" (1912) by Ludwig von Mises
User avatar
Clinton P. Desveaux
 
Posts: 3876
Joined: 02/ 10/ 04 9:56 pm

Postby Clinton P. Desveaux » 03/ 08/ 07 1:46 pm

Kate Shaw wrote:Yes. For those of us from other countries who have both vested pension plans and Social Security coming to us, it would be nice to have that CPP money to spend while we are in Canada, before Mandatory Retirement forces us back to our own cozy country.

But I'm not holding my breath.


Great point!
Before you comment on economics buy a new or used a copy of "Theory of Money and Credit" (1912) by Ludwig von Mises
User avatar
Clinton P. Desveaux
 
Posts: 3876
Joined: 02/ 10/ 04 9:56 pm

Postby HeywoodFloyd » 03/ 08/ 07 1:47 pm

Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
Stange, I have children, own a home, and work, and oddly enough if I could keep my CPP contributions I would have more money for savings with better returns.


The most you could have paid into the CPP in 2006 was about $1910. Thats because there is a contribution ceiling.

I spend more than that on beer.


I don't undestand your point. That $1910 is my money which I earned, why should I be prevented from investing it?


You are investing it.
"You secular-progressive pinko" - Unnamed FD Poster.
HeywoodFloyd
 
Posts: 3086
Joined: 06/ 12/ 03 11:03 am

Postby Clinton P. Desveaux » 03/ 08/ 07 1:51 pm

HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
Stange, I have children, own a home, and work, and oddly enough if I could keep my CPP contributions I would have more money for savings with better returns.


The most you could have paid into the CPP in 2006 was about $1910. Thats because there is a contribution ceiling.

I spend more than that on beer.


I don't undestand your point. That $1910 is my money which I earned, why should I be prevented from investing it?


You are investing it.


I think you missed the point, I or anyone else should be able to opt out of the CPP and invest whatever monies I want when I want, not at the behest of the state.
Before you comment on economics buy a new or used a copy of "Theory of Money and Credit" (1912) by Ludwig von Mises
User avatar
Clinton P. Desveaux
 
Posts: 3876
Joined: 02/ 10/ 04 9:56 pm

Postby Rob E » 03/ 08/ 07 1:57 pm

HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
Stange, I have children, own a home, and work, and oddly enough if I could keep my CPP contributions I would have more money for savings with better returns.


The most you could have paid into the CPP in 2006 was about $1910. Thats because there is a contribution ceiling.

I spend more than that on beer.


I don't undestand your point. That $1910 is my money which I earned, why should I be prevented from investing it?


You are investing it.


Yes, but I'm being forced to invest it. I can find other places to invest for better returns. Plus what does the government do with that money. Does some of it go to groups that do or believe in things I do not. It does as the Liberals showed as so well. Why should my money do into that.
check out my blog here: http://robtoria.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Rob E
 
Posts: 868
Joined: 01/ 22/ 05 3:22 am
Location: BC- Maple Ridge

Postby Red Green » 03/ 08/ 07 2:07 pm

HeywoodFloyd wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
Stange, I have children, own a home, and work, and oddly enough if I could keep my CPP contributions I would have more money for savings with better returns.


The most you could have paid into the CPP in 2006 was about $1910. Thats because there is a contribution ceiling.

I spend more than that on beer.


So you could have almost doubled your beer intake for the year if it had not been for CPP. And you would have been better off as well!
"The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. Each is the proper guardian of his own health, whether bodily, or mental or spiritual. Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest." ~ John Stuart Mill
User avatar
Red Green
 
Posts: 13595
Joined: 02/ 03/ 04 12:59 am
Location: AZ

Postby Roy Wilson » 03/ 08/ 07 2:08 pm

Should Canada Pension Plan Participation Be Voluntary?

Yes

Crap on this I agree with Green :brows:
Head up his ass

Image
SUPPORT THE TROOPS THEY KEEP YOU FREE. SUPPORT FARMERS, THEY FEED YOU.

ImageSUPPORT ISRAEL

Image
User avatar
Roy Wilson
 
Posts: 27723
Joined: 04/ 04/ 04 12:53 pm
Location: Peterborough

Postby Manganic » 03/ 08/ 07 2:10 pm

Adonick wrote:
Clinton P. Desveaux wrote:
Adonick wrote:
Manganic wrote:
Adonick wrote:Surprisingly, I too believe that CPP should be mandatory.


Yes; that does indeed surprise me.

Care to tell us why you would support such a tyrannical concept?


Because I do not believe the average Canadian can afford to save for retirement, and it serves as a basic safety net for the elderly, whom, in my opinion, deserve to be taken care of for their years of hard work.

Take for example a lifelong retail employee. I highly doubt that they can afford a fancy retirement package - and they do one of the most thankless jobs.

I am very pro-market, but it can't solve everything. Sometimes a touch of compassion is necessary in the right places.


But most people own homes, get jobs, and buy food, so why would they not be able to plan for retirement? You take a rather shallow view of individuals.


A large segment of society mortgages their home, both work, buy food, and still live from paycheque to paycheque. I would suggest that most people would struggle to put together any reasonable amount of money towards a retirement plan that may last two decades. If you don't believe that's the case, I feel you live a world of books rather than dealing with the average person.


I consider myself to be an average person.

I manage to do all of the above, and I don't live from paycheque to paycheque. I don't drive a particulary flashy car, I don't have a big-screen plasma TV, and my two computers are old beaters.

I put money away for retirement, buy food, pay my mortgage, car loan, and take a vacation from time to time.

It is possible; people just have to prioritize.

"Broke" is temporary. Poverty is a state of mind.

Relying on the government to look after you is a poverty mentality.
"Every person's life is theirs by right. An individual's life can and must belong only to himself, not to any society or community, or he is then but a slave. No one can deny another person their right to their life, nor seize by force what is produced by someone else, because that is stealing their means to sustain their life. It is treason against mankind to hold a knife to a man's throat and dictate how he must live his life."
-- Terry Goodkind, Faith of the Fallen
User avatar
Manganic
 
Posts: 1956
Joined: 01/ 01/ 06 11:49 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Postby Red Green » 03/ 08/ 07 2:16 pm

Roy Wilson wrote:Should Canada Pension Plan Participation Be Voluntary?

Yes

Crap on this I agree with Green :brows:
Head up his ass

Image


Well I take back what I said about you Roy. You're not a complete idiot... :lol: :lol: :lol:
"The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. Each is the proper guardian of his own health, whether bodily, or mental or spiritual. Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest." ~ John Stuart Mill
User avatar
Red Green
 
Posts: 13595
Joined: 02/ 03/ 04 12:59 am
Location: AZ

Postby Tory_canuck » 03/ 08/ 07 2:20 pm

Hailey wrote:I voted that it should not be voluntary.


I voted yes, mainly cuz, I am paying into something I am NOT benefitting from.When KFC shut down and I lost my job there, I applied for EI, but never got it, even though I paid into it.It would have been alot easier if I just didn't bother filling out the form.I got work pretty darn quickly.Ei's just a waste of time and money here in AB.I hope it does become voluntary, so I won't have to put another cent into it.EI is just a scam so gov't could milk more money out of taxpayers to put into general revenue and line their own pockets.CPP is the same thing.I like the old Reform/CA idea way better.I wish Harper would follow through on it.I hate paying for something I'm not getting any good from.
Image

OFFENDING LEFT WING THUMB SUCKING PANSIES SINCE SEPTEMBER 5, 2005!!!Image

"Mother Nature visualized brilliance in everything; but surely was drunk when she created the liberal."
Greg Evans
User avatar
Tory_canuck
 
Posts: 6678
Joined: 09/ 05/ 05 2:34 am
Location: Red Deer, AB

Postby Tory_canuck » 03/ 08/ 07 2:26 pm

Adonick wrote:So individuals whom work in the retail sector, or food service, or any number of low-paying jobs do not deserve to be able to comfortably retire after "getting a job" for 50 years? Just because they didn't become doctors or lawyers with six figure salaries does not mean they do not deserve a comfortable old age.


The key question is SHOULD EI/CPP BE VOLUNTARY, which means, if you don't want to pay into it you can opt out, but if you want to have the same CPP/EI, you can.It just means you have the option available to decide whether you as an individual can opt out of the CPP/EI.We are not saying abolish the EI/CPP, we are just saying, mak it VOLUNTARY.
Image

OFFENDING LEFT WING THUMB SUCKING PANSIES SINCE SEPTEMBER 5, 2005!!!Image

"Mother Nature visualized brilliance in everything; but surely was drunk when she created the liberal."
Greg Evans
User avatar
Tory_canuck
 
Posts: 6678
Joined: 09/ 05/ 05 2:34 am
Location: Red Deer, AB

Postby Roy Wilson » 03/ 08/ 07 2:52 pm

Red Green wrote:
Roy Wilson wrote:Should Canada Pension Plan Participation Be Voluntary?

Yes

Crap on this I agree with Green :brows:
Head up his ass

Image


Well I take back what I said about you Roy. You're not a complete idiot... :lol: :lol: :lol:


Hell I knew that but you are still an ashole :brows:
SUPPORT THE TROOPS THEY KEEP YOU FREE. SUPPORT FARMERS, THEY FEED YOU.

ImageSUPPORT ISRAEL

Image
User avatar
Roy Wilson
 
Posts: 27723
Joined: 04/ 04/ 04 12:53 pm
Location: Peterborough

PreviousNext

Return to Freedom Party of Canada

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests