Vote conservative, not Tory!

The latest news, by Free Dominion's greatest news hound!

Postby Frankie » 09/ 05/ 07 9:50 am

I think the FCP will be well represented this time out.
When you've been lied to left & right it's time to go back to the basics.
If voting my conscience cost either liberal or conservative a victory I could care less. I sleep better at night & I didn't have to even consider the NDP.
The opinions expressed by the above poster are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the forum's moderators or owners. Questions and comments can be sent to the boy on the right.
User avatar
Frankie
 
Posts: 6662
Joined: 03/ 30/ 03 3:08 am
Location: Ontario

Postby Felix Culpa » 09/ 05/ 07 11:53 am

SUZANNE wrote:
Felix Culpa wrote:Check out the <a href=http://www.familycoalitionparty.com/ctable.htm>fine slate of candidates</a> the FCP has to offer!
I think there are more to come. There are at least 4 more candidates that I know of that aren't listed there.
Good! as of my last accessing of the website, it was listing 67 candidates in 107 ridings = 63% coverage. Another 4 would bring that up to 66% coverage. Not bad!
Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the 'mystery of iniquity' in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth... --CCC #675
User avatar
Felix Culpa
 
Posts: 8527
Joined: 04/ 15/ 05 10:27 am

Postby Retired_can_soldier » 09/ 06/ 07 11:17 pm

GratianGasparri wrote:
Retired_can_soldier wrote:So paying full price for a piece of shit car is better?


If Dalton's policies are so crappy, why isn't John Tory advocating something different?

You may as well vote Liberal and by choosing such a path you are.


You sound like a teenager having a temper tantrum because mommy and daddy won't buy you a $400 dress for the prom.

As most of the regulars can attest, we've gotten past this attempt at electoral blackmail by the "PC party, right or wrong" crowd.

In short, the blame lay with those within the PC party who have not given a credible alternative [read: conservative] for whom to vote.

Put another way, it's up to the PC party to earn my vote.


Nope no tantrum here. Frustration with folks who can't see past their own agenda's and get the big picture.

What is being proposed here is on the same level of intelligence as Jack Layton voting against a motion to bring the troops home in 2009 because he wants them home now.

Now that sounds like a temper tantrum.

You want Dalton, you'll get him. I just can't wait for the hypocrisy and bitching when he starts raising taxes and pissing everyone off. You have in essence relinquished your vote therefore you have also relinquished your opinion.

As for teaching Tory a lesson. Give me a break.

Get over yourself
User avatar
Retired_can_soldier
 
Posts: 11
Joined: 09/ 02/ 07 8:31 pm
Location: Ontario

Postby Jason Kauppinen » 09/ 07/ 07 2:58 am

Retired_can_soldier wrote:So paying full price for a piece of shit car is better?


Nope I'm not voting for Dalton either.

THE PROBLEM that you people don't seem to get is that this:

You may as well vote Liberal and by choosing such a path you are.


Is the same result as voting for John Tory.

So you can whine and complain all you want. Liberal leaders aren't getting my support--it doesn't matter if they wear a blue tie or a red tie.

If compromise is your main value then you should have had no problem compromising totally by supporting Flaherty or another real conservative as party leader.

Then people like me who demand substance over garbage like "I'm John Tory and I display leadership" crap would have supported the OPC.

But that's fine, we'll kick him out after he loses.
Warren Kinsella is the Jar Jar Binks of Canadian Politics

1985 (OPC Minority)/1987 (Loss) /2003 (Loss)/2007 (Loss) --The OPC Red Tory record.

"Back in 1215, if you read Magna Carta Libertatum (my italics; I don’t think they had ’em back then), human rights meant the King was restrained by his subjects. Eight hundred years later, “human rights” CHRC-style means that the subjects get restrained by the Crown, in the form of Queen Jennifer. I liked it better the old way." -Mark Steyn
User avatar
Jason Kauppinen
 
Posts: 11954
Joined: 12/ 26/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Postby Jason Kauppinen » 09/ 07/ 07 3:04 am

Retired_can_soldier wrote:You want Dalton, you'll get him.


If I don't want Dalton why would I vote for Tory. He's identical.

Basically you can't give us a reason to support Tory. Because to earn that support he would have to be a real conservative and actually support conservative policies. He does not.

And the real telling thing about this thread is that you've posted NOTHING to counter this fact--yet demand that Tory should get our support anyhow because of big bad Dalton.

The fact is, John Tory simply will not deliver conservative policy.
Warren Kinsella is the Jar Jar Binks of Canadian Politics

1985 (OPC Minority)/1987 (Loss) /2003 (Loss)/2007 (Loss) --The OPC Red Tory record.

"Back in 1215, if you read Magna Carta Libertatum (my italics; I don’t think they had ’em back then), human rights meant the King was restrained by his subjects. Eight hundred years later, “human rights” CHRC-style means that the subjects get restrained by the Crown, in the form of Queen Jennifer. I liked it better the old way." -Mark Steyn
User avatar
Jason Kauppinen
 
Posts: 11954
Joined: 12/ 26/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Postby Retired_can_soldier » 09/ 07/ 07 1:26 pm

So who do you want then? By the way I'm not whining, but excellent assumption on your part. Funny how folks get their back up when you point out the obvious flaw in their reasoning.

No point beating this dog. It's already dead.
User avatar
Retired_can_soldier
 
Posts: 11
Joined: 09/ 02/ 07 8:31 pm
Location: Ontario

Postby Felix Culpa » 09/ 07/ 07 1:29 pm

Retired_can_soldier wrote:So who do you want then? By the way I'm not whining, but excellent assumption on your part. Funny how folks get their back up when you point out the obvious flaw in their reasoning.

No point beating this dog. It's already dead.
Dunno 'bout you, but I want the FCP policy platform. That's why I am voting for them.
Before Christ's second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the 'mystery of iniquity' in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth... --CCC #675
User avatar
Felix Culpa
 
Posts: 8527
Joined: 04/ 15/ 05 10:27 am

Postby GratianGasparri » 09/ 07/ 07 1:55 pm

Retired_can_soldier wrote:Nope no tantrum here. Frustration with folks who can't see past their own agenda's and get the big picture.


And how is John Tory any different than Dalton McGuinty in the big picture?

You want Dalton, you'll get him.


And if you want Tory, it's up to you to get him.

Personally, I don't see the difference. But to each his own.
Last edited by GratianGasparri on 09/ 07/ 07 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
GratianGasparri
 
Posts: 4761
Joined: 08/ 22/ 03 11:31 pm

Postby GratianGasparri » 09/ 07/ 07 1:55 pm

Retired_can_soldier wrote:So who do you want then?


A conservative.
User avatar
GratianGasparri
 
Posts: 4761
Joined: 08/ 22/ 03 11:31 pm

Postby Dacre » 09/ 07/ 07 2:03 pm

Retired writes

So who do you want then? By the way I'm not whining, but excellent assumption on your part. Funny how folks get their back up when you point out the obvious flaw in their reasoning.

Sorry but I think you have the flawed reasoning. This sounds like a broken record but obviously you don't understand the logic. Just because the OPC has Conservative in its name does not make it conservative. John Tory wanted to throw all the true conservatives overboard because he is a liberal and chose to appeal to Toronto and the urban voter with a socially progressive agenda. The man basically agrees with the Liberals agenda and just claims he can do it better than Dalton. Great consolation that is. John Tory and his ilk loathe social conservatives and makes that clear. John Tory loathes the Mike Harris legacy. John Tory decided to go for a particular constituency believing that was his ticket for success. I think it was a mistake and he was wrong. The election will give us the result of this decision. Why would conservatives want to support a party that doesn't support them. You must be a liberal yourself if you can't understand this.
Dacre
 
Posts: 10246
Joined: 12/ 17/ 03 3:03 am
Location: Niagara Peninsula

Postby Fabulous Fred » 09/ 07/ 07 3:39 pm

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v622/bigRM/faithbasedschooling-1.jpg">
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

Frederic Bastiat
User avatar
Fabulous Fred
 
Posts: 17297
Joined: 10/ 24/ 06 3:21 pm

Postby Jason Kauppinen » 09/ 07/ 07 4:03 pm

Retired_can_soldier wrote:So who do you want then? By the way I'm not whining, but excellent assumption on your part. Funny how folks get their back up when you point out the obvious flaw in their reasoning.


Yeah it's just as valid a line of reasoning as demanding support for a Liberal instead of a Liberal eh?

I want Tory out as leader and a real conservative in.

I want the Progressive name dropped from the OPC.

I want policy determined by delegates at a convention instead of this undemocratic "consultation" crap.

For starters.
Warren Kinsella is the Jar Jar Binks of Canadian Politics

1985 (OPC Minority)/1987 (Loss) /2003 (Loss)/2007 (Loss) --The OPC Red Tory record.

"Back in 1215, if you read Magna Carta Libertatum (my italics; I don’t think they had ’em back then), human rights meant the King was restrained by his subjects. Eight hundred years later, “human rights” CHRC-style means that the subjects get restrained by the Crown, in the form of Queen Jennifer. I liked it better the old way." -Mark Steyn
User avatar
Jason Kauppinen
 
Posts: 11954
Joined: 12/ 26/ 01 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Postby fourhorses » 09/ 07/ 07 10:14 pm

Felix Culpa wrote:
SUZANNE wrote:
Felix Culpa wrote:Check out the <a href=http://www.familycoalitionparty.com/ctable.htm>fine slate of candidates</a> the FCP has to offer!


How do you know they are fine ?
User avatar
fourhorses
 
Posts: 23902
Joined: 01/ 23/ 06 9:23 pm

Postby SUZANNE » 09/ 07/ 07 10:16 pm

Because she knows some of them :D
SUZANNE
 
Posts: 9653
Joined: 04/ 29/ 03 8:44 am
Location: Ottawa

Postby fourhorses » 09/ 07/ 07 10:20 pm

SUZANNE wrote:Because she knows some of them :D

I looked up the candidate in my riding (Mississauga-Streetsville) - Never heard of him. No presence noticed hereabouts.

Has a lot of ground to cover to catch the libs and torries
User avatar
fourhorses
 
Posts: 23902
Joined: 01/ 23/ 06 9:23 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Styky Notes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest