The War on the Fathers & its Results on the Family (Video)

For the discussion of issues specific to Father's rights. A refuge from the onslaught of politically correct militant feminism.

Re: The War on the Fathers & its Results on the Family (Vide

Postby Narrow Back » 06/ 04/ 12 1:26 pm

Kate Shaw wrote:In my observation (from the bleachers), what society did is give men an escape clause, and most of them seem to have taken it.

If men really wanted to be married and responsible for a family, they would be doing it. The truth appears to be that they prefer to lurk in the basement and play X-Box games and let someone else support their children.

Not all of them, by no means. But all the ones in this argument. It's not The Government or Mom and Dad that are forcing you to scatter fatherless babies hither and yon for the purpose of putting another notch in your bedpost and nothing else.

You're doing it Because You Can.


What utter nonsense. Your hatred for all things family makes me sick to my stomach.
I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.
John Diefenbaker (From the Canadian Bill of Rights, July 1, 1960.)
User avatar
Narrow Back
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: 04/ 05/ 08 1:37 pm

Re: The War on the Fathers & its Results on the Family (Vide

Postby Hubert Mitchell » 06/ 04/ 12 6:22 pm

Narrow Back wrote:
Kate Shaw wrote:The truth appears to be that they prefer to lurk in the basement and play X-Box games and let someone else support their children.

Not all of them, by no means. But all the ones in this argument. It's not The Government or Mom and Dad that are forcing you to scatter fatherless babies hither and yon for the purpose of putting another notch in your bedpost and nothing else.

You're doing it Because You Can.


What utter nonsense. Your hatred for all things family makes me sick to my stomach.


Thank you Narrow Black. This need by feminists to say they are not feminists (because of their unpopularity), and to take any criticism of bad women and turn it into a discussion of bad men is old old old. Is it possible there are as many bad women as bad men? Are there women that want to get pregnant out of wedlock, even when her boyfriend doesn't want her too? Her choice becomes his fun time (as if she doesn't have fun) so she can cover her butt and get the state to pay the bill and blame him at the gossipfests.

We can compare the worst males in our society to the wort females in our society all day long, and there are people who just love to look at such things over the big picture. This topic was about the big picture, but has gone personal (Kate's family situation where all her sisters are perfect and have been married many times each and they are as pure and the driven snow and all their boyfriends are the cause of their down fall, at least at their gossipfests). Women are now powers on to themselves, and if such women choose bad husbands they are responsible for those bad choices and not the men who are unlikely to have been anything other than what they were beforehand.

Where was the women's intuition, where were the superior skills of communication to break down these males lies before hooking up? Where were the endless best friends to warn these women about these men and save them from several bad marriages each? Well then the powerful women of today become the best of the old ways again and need defending again from the likes of Rhinstone cowboys & manginas who are quick on the draw on any male, because nature has made males territorial of other males over that of questionable females.

We are not animals and it is time that female animals stop getting the best of both worlds( modern rights and old fashion rights and should be forced to make feminists choose once and for all which mix they want for all women.) My bet is the best of the old ways and the best of the new ways will continue to be demanded and the responsibilities of the old ways and the responsibilities of new ways will continued to be passed on to the state, men, the children, the turban bitters, the Moslems and just about anyone but those empowered women that continue to take their half of our society ,with their mental gymnastic games of playing the victim half the time and being empowered the other half when they feeeeel like it, and take us down the drain.

The big picture not your small petty picture dear.
Code: Select all
www.infowars.com
Code: Select all
www.prisonplanet.com
Code: Select all
mises.org
User avatar
Hubert Mitchell
 
Posts: 3624
Joined: 01/ 27/ 07 7:53 am
Location: Abroad

Re: The War on the Fathers & its Results on the Family (Vide

Postby Narrow Back » 06/ 04/ 12 7:11 pm

Hubert Mitchell wrote:
Narrow Back wrote:
Kate Shaw wrote:The truth appears to be that they prefer to lurk in the basement and play X-Box games and let someone else support their children.

Not all of them, by no means. But all the ones in this argument. It's not The Government or Mom and Dad that are forcing you to scatter fatherless babies hither and yon for the purpose of putting another notch in your bedpost and nothing else.

You're doing it Because You Can.


What utter nonsense. Your hatred for all things family makes me sick to my stomach.


Thank you Narrow Black. This need by feminists to say they are not feminists (because of their unpopularity), and to take any criticism of bad women and turn it into a discussion of bad men is old old old. Is it possible there are as many bad women as bad men? Are there women that want to get pregnant out of wedlock, even when her boyfriend doesn't want her too? Her choice becomes his fun time (as if she doesn't have fun) so she can cover her butt and get the state to pay the bill and blame him at the gossipfests.

We can compare the worst males in our society to the wort females in our society all day long, and there are people who just love to look at such things over the big picture. This topic was about the big picture, but has gone personal (Kate's family situation where all her sisters are perfect and have been married many times each and they are as pure and the driven snow and all their boyfriends are the cause of their down fall, at least at their gossipfests). Women are now powers on to themselves, and if such women choose bad husbands they are responsible for those bad choices and not the men who are unlikely to have been anything other than what they were beforehand.

Where was the women's intuition, where were the superior skills of communication to break down these males lies before hooking up? Where were the endless best friends to warn these women about these men and save them from several bad marriages each? Well then the powerful women of today become the best of the old ways again and need defending again from the likes of Rhinstone cowboys & manginas who are quick on the draw on any male, because nature has made males territorial of other males over that of questionable females.

We are not animals and it is time that female animals stop getting the best of both worlds( modern rights and old fashion rights and should be forced to make feminists choose once and for all which mix they want for all women.) My bet is the best of the old ways and the best of the new ways will continue to be demanded and the responsibilities of the old ways and the responsibilities of new ways will continued to be passed on to the state, men, the children, the turban bitters, the Moslems and just about anyone but those empowered women that continue to take their half of our society ,with their mental gymnastic games of playing the victim half the time and being empowered the other half when they feeeeel like it, and take us down the drain.

The big picture not your small petty picture dear.


Well said Hubert. We are not in total agreement on all your points, but close enough.




I don't know if you have seen this. I can only watch for a few minutes. It's rather painful. Strangely funny though! A friend of mine said "I kept waiting for the punchline but it didn't come".

Maybe these are the sort of "men" Kate has envisioned! :lol:

Warning! May cause nightmares!
I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.
John Diefenbaker (From the Canadian Bill of Rights, July 1, 1960.)
User avatar
Narrow Back
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: 04/ 05/ 08 1:37 pm

Re: The War on the Fathers & its Results on the Family (Vide

Postby shiva » 06/ 04/ 12 7:21 pm

Narrow Back wrote:
Hubert Mitchell wrote:
Narrow Back wrote:
Kate Shaw wrote:The truth appears to be that they prefer to lurk in the basement and play X-Box games and let someone else support their children.

Not all of them, by no means. But all the ones in this argument. It's not The Government or Mom and Dad that are forcing you to scatter fatherless babies hither and yon for the purpose of putting another notch in your bedpost and nothing else.

You're doing it Because You Can.


What utter nonsense. Your hatred for all things family makes me sick to my stomach.


Thank you Narrow Black. This need by feminists to say they are not feminists (because of their unpopularity), and to take any criticism of bad women and turn it into a discussion of bad men is old old old. Is it possible there are as many bad women as bad men? Are there women that want to get pregnant out of wedlock, even when her boyfriend doesn't want her too? Her choice becomes his fun time (as if she doesn't have fun) so she can cover her butt and get the state to pay the bill and blame him at the gossipfests.

We can compare the worst males in our society to the wort females in our society all day long, and there are people who just love to look at such things over the big picture. This topic was about the big picture, but has gone personal (Kate's family situation where all her sisters are perfect and have been married many times each and they are as pure and the driven snow and all their boyfriends are the cause of their down fall, at least at their gossipfests). Women are now powers on to themselves, and if such women choose bad husbands they are responsible for those bad choices and not the men who are unlikely to have been anything other than what they were beforehand.

Where was the women's intuition, where were the superior skills of communication to break down these males lies before hooking up? Where were the endless best friends to warn these women about these men and save them from several bad marriages each? Well then the powerful women of today become the best of the old ways again and need defending again from the likes of Rhinstone cowboys & manginas who are quick on the draw on any male, because nature has made males territorial of other males over that of questionable females.

We are not animals and it is time that female animals stop getting the best of both worlds( modern rights and old fashion rights and should be forced to make feminists choose once and for all which mix they want for all women.) My bet is the best of the old ways and the best of the new ways will continue to be demanded and the responsibilities of the old ways and the responsibilities of new ways will continued to be passed on to the state, men, the children, the turban bitters, the Moslems and just about anyone but those empowered women that continue to take their half of our society ,with their mental gymnastic games of playing the victim half the time and being empowered the other half when they feeeeel like it, and take us down the drain.

The big picture not your small petty picture dear.


Well said Hubert. We are not in total agreement on all your points, but close enough.




I don't know if you have seen this. I can only watch for a few minutes. It's rather painful. Strangely funny though! A friend of mine said "I kept waiting for the punchline but it didn't come".

Maybe these are the sort of "men" Kate has envisioned! :lol:

Warning! May cause nightmares!


I'm sure I'm not the only woman who couldn't watch that video either. Good grief! PAINFUL!

Here's a pretty funny parody of that travesty, with Will Ferrell and some pals:

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/55c51f0c23/dear-woman
shiva
 
Posts: 6401
Joined: 10/ 13/ 03 11:46 am

Re: The War on the Fathers & its Results on the Family (Vide

Postby Hubert Mitchell » 06/ 04/ 12 7:37 pm

Narrow Back wrote:
Well said Hubert. We are not in total agreement on all your points, but close enough.

I don't know if you have seen this. I can only watch for a few minutes. It's rather painful. Strangely funny though! A friend of mine said "I kept waiting for the punchline but it didn't come".

Maybe these are the sort of "men" Kate has envisioned! :lol:

Warning! May cause nightmares!


Yes they are called Manginas. Most are sheeple who follow their false shepherds. The shepherds are NWO funded and preach the new age of Aquarius, which is really the old age of following the constellationists. They are said to be into buggery, but there is no way to tell because they are so secret about everything they do. "Wicked people hide when no one pursues"
Code: Select all
www.infowars.com
Code: Select all
www.prisonplanet.com
Code: Select all
mises.org
User avatar
Hubert Mitchell
 
Posts: 3624
Joined: 01/ 27/ 07 7:53 am
Location: Abroad

Re: The War on the Fathers & its Results on the Family (Vide

Postby Ben Kenobi » 06/ 04/ 12 8:24 pm

In my observation (from the bleachers), what society did is give men an escape clause, and most of them seem to have taken it.

If men really wanted to be married and responsible for a family, they would be doing it. The truth appears to be that they prefer to lurk in the basement and play X-Box games and let someone else support their children.

Not all of them, by no means. But all the ones in this argument. It's not The Government or Mom and Dad that are forcing you to scatter fatherless babies hither and yon for the purpose of putting another notch in your bedpost and nothing else.

You're doing it Because You Can.


I prefer to lurk in the basement and play X-Box! It's cooler down there, plus it's fun to play with the kids when you are looking after them so that mama can get some rest. :)

But hey, at least she's appreciative to have a man around. :D Very appreciative. ;)

Course, I'm just one of those losers, who works to provide for three younguns' but I enjoy my summers looking after them when they are out of school.
Your overall argument is:
"The US states do not fund abortions. Canada's provinces do fund abortions; therefore Canada is bad and, gosh, I can use the term "abortuaries" with a sneer."

- Westviking on prolifers.
User avatar
Ben Kenobi
 
Posts: 6192
Joined: 01/ 12/ 06 1:19 am
Location: San Antonio TX

Previous

Return to Father's Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest