Roy Green: Ottawa offers $2,000 sweetener to refugee claimants
Roy Green Aug 26, 2011 – 8:30 AM ET | Last Updated: Aug 26, 2011 8:22 AM ET
“Failed” refugee claimants will be offered a fistful of dollars and a one-way ticket home under Ottawa’s Balanced Refugee Reform Act. For being so agreeable the failed refugees may be permitted to make application to return.
If we haven’t lost our minds, we have collided head on with the end of our wits: A person enters Canada fraudulently, is determined to remain here illegally as long as he or she considers the payoff sufficient, is turfed yet also rewarded with a sly understanding that Canada’s welcome mat will be extended in the future.
The process is known as the Assisted Voluntary Return (AVR) program. A title modification to Assisted Voluntary Return and Return (AVR&R) Program would make more sense.
How long will it be before $2,000 — the amount available for “reintegration assistance”, in addition to a plane ticket home — is determined to be a little short in the chips department to entice sufficient numbers of the “failed” to come forward, cash in and head out? Not long I suspect. Stand by for the Supplemental Assisted Voluntary Return and Return Funding Initiative (SAVR&RFI) announcement.
We’re assured that the $2,000 lure to leave Canada won’t be sufficiently attractive to overseas refugee cheaters-in-waiting to target Canada in increased numbers. Really? Just how soft is Canada’s refugee system underbody?
Not long ago a friend and Canadian of Mexican origin shared a story of how comedic Canada’s refugee regulations are viewed outside this nation’s borders. He and his wife were enjoying an old Montreal restaurant dinner when they heard Spanish being spoken by a young couple at an adjoining table. Turns out the other couple was also from Mexico. “What are you doing in Canada” my friend asked. “We’re refugee claimants”. My friend, who had worked three jobs to pay for and successfully navigate the immigration bureaucracy for himself and his bride, offered his immigration lawyer’s telephone number, urging the couple to follow his lead and drop their refugee claim.
“Oh no. You don’t understand. We’re newly married and only claimed refugee status in order to have our honeymoon paid for by Canada. We’re going to stay a while longer, then drop our claim and return home”. My friend was and remains furious. His and your tax dollars underwrote the scam.
What completes the mad circle is that when the Mexican honeymooners eventually did drop their refugee claim, the federal government bureaucracy would have stroked them from the “waiting to be resolved” case files and claimed a success.
What Ottawa should have the political fortitude to engage is the Constitutional Notwithstanding Clause and overturn the 1985 Supreme Court of Canada so-called Singh decision, which enshrined Charter of Rights protection to anyone with the means to reach Canada.
This included convicted California serial killer Charles Ng, who prior to his escape from authorities had plotted his route to our shores after carefully considering jurisdictions which offered him the greatest likelihood of state protection from extradition to the United States.
Because Ng faced the death penalty for his vicious streak of murders and rapes, Canada’s Supreme Court had to decide whether this made him ineligible for removal. The court decided appropriately. By one vote.
Ottawa should over-ride the Singh decision, not engage in Assisted Voluntary Returns.
National Post
Roy Green is host of the Roy Green Show on the Corus Radio Network. Read more here.
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/201 ... claimants/


Less Ottawa.](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
